Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Phi-3.5-mini
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#243); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSide by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.6 | 36.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 32.9 (#255), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 21.0 (#206), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.6 (#206), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.3 (#223), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.2 (#264), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 58.0 (#259), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#239), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.3 (#269), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#243); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.