Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Phi-3.5-mini
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#248); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSide by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 36.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#248); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.