Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has enough public results to be ranked (#251); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1235 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1220 |
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1242 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1246 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1233 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has enough public results to be ranked (#251); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi-3.5-mini or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.