Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Mistral Small 3.2
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.0 to 34.1.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | — |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1159 | — |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.