Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 5.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-Coder-32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 33.3 to 26.3.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 33K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.233.4
Released2025-06-202024-09-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K33K
Max output16K29K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938$0.66
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$1
Results tracked631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
LMArena Coding—1276
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74119.49
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
Chess Puzzles1%—
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1251
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%—
LiveBench Math—46.6%
LMArena Math—1251
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
LMArena Expert—1221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English—1205
LMArena Chinese—1222
LMArena Russian—1228

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1223

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query—1251

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text—1230
LMArena Creative Writing—1174
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 5.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen2.5-Coder-32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper