Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Mistral Small 3.2
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 45.0 to 36.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 31.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.74 |
Math Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 2 2b IT leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.2 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.