Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 7 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.6 to 27.2.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index31.633.0
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1417

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding11121130
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10921127

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11431173

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert10871108

Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10371094
LMArena Chinese10631108
LMArena Russian10601145
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10881113

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11221120

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text10961138
LMArena Creative Writing10711107
LMArena Multi-Turn10631088

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper