Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 58.8 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderIBMStepFun
Noometry Index31.642.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding11121436
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts10921411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math11431408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert10871421

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English10371385
LMArena Chinese10631447
LMArena Russian10601385
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1354
LMArena Korean—1352
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following10881385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query11221402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text10961403
LMArena Creative Writing10711357
LMArena Multi-Turn10631405

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper