Model comparison
o1-pro vs Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 39.0 to 29.3.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- Step 3.5 Flash accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 200K.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | 256K |
| Max output | 100K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1436 |
Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads
o1-pro: 20.2 (#223), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1411 |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1408 |
Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads
o1-pro: 29.3 (#227), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1422 |
Multilingual Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1448 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1385 |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1402 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Step 3.5 Flash does, with 256K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Step 3.5 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.