Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Pro

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 31.1.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index31.643.0
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Coding11121476
LMArena WebDev—1433
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—
ALE-Bench—785.17

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts10921457
NYT Connections (extended)—25.8%
Thematic Generalization—45.9%

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Math11431447

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Expert10871478

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Non-English10371416
LMArena Chinese10631456
LMArena Russian10601427
LMArena French—1469
LMArena German—1417
LMArena Japanese—1366
LMArena Korean—1400
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following10881445

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11221455
CL-bench—15.7%
CL-bench Life—6.9%

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2-Pro
LMArena Text10961436
LMArena Creative Writing10711415
LMArena Multi-Turn10631456

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper