Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs o1-pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 41.4 to 29.7.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or o1-pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.