Model comparison
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 31.6.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1025 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1047 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1072 | 1447 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1063 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1060 | 1445 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 998 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1098 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1058 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.