Model comparison

Command A vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Command A Cohere

36.5

Rank #215 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 27.2.

Side by side

Command A and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
Command AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderCohereIBM
Noometry Index36.531.6
Released2025-03-13—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$2.50—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked2414

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Command A: 27.2 (#322), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding13301112
Aider Polyglot12%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Command A: 35.9 (#40), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard57.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Command A: 18.3 (#283), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13261092
Kagi LLM Benchmark28.8%—
DTBench61.3%—
LMCA10.3%—

Math Command A leads

Command A: 36.2 (#171), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math13001143

Knowledge Command A leads

Command A: 37.1 (#159), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert12951087
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—

Multilingual Command A leads

Command A: 45.3 (#170), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13131037
LMArena Chinese13271063
LMArena Russian13141060
LMArena French1351—
LMArena German1341—
LMArena Japanese1285—
LMArena Korean1285—
LMArena Spanish1347—

Instruction Following Command A leads

Command A: 69.1 (#177), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13091088

Long Context Command A leads

Command A: 40.6 (#151), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13341122

Writing & Preference Command A leads

Command A: 47.6 (#208), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkCommand AGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text13311096
LMArena Creative Writing13191071
LMArena Multi-Turn13391063
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1145—

Frequently asked questions

Is Command A better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Command A or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.7 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Command A and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper