Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen3.5-9B

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 36× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

49.2

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.3

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 49.3 to 22.5.
  • Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6 Sol.
  • GPT-6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
GPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index49.233.3
Released2026-09-222026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M262K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$10$0.15
Results tracked2210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 59.6 (#11), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1692—
SciCode—27.5%
LMArena Coding1453—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 33.5 (#49), Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%
GDP.pdf28%—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 49.3 (#34), Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—12%
EBR-Bench53.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1420—
DTBench—71.2%
LMCA—24.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.45

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 35.8 (#135), Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%
LMArena Math1404—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.0 (#87), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—
LMArena Expert1449—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#9), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 51.0 (#113), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1416—
LMArena Russian1407—
LMArena Spanish1377—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 74.4 (#97), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 43.2 (#100), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Longer Query1415—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 72.3 (#15), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text1396—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—
LMArena Multi-Turn1405—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen3.5-9B?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.2 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 36× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-6 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 59.6 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Qwen3.5-9B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper