Model comparison
GPT-6 Sol vs Grok-2 (Dec 2024)
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 100% for GPT-6 Sol and 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024).
Side by side
| GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 61.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2024-08-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 45 | 34 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1287 |
| DeepSWE | 68.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 49.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1688 | — |
| SciCode | 57.6% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 22.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 46.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 2,462 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 26.4% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 14,428 | — |
Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1418 | 1272 |
| DTBench | 97.3% | 65.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.72 | 130.48 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 89.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 90.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 95.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.9% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 53.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 54.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 56% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 54.5% |
| LMCA | 59.1% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
Math GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | 11.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1402 | 1283 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 89.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 90% | — |
| ProofBench | 83% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 54.9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.7% |
Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.3% | 53.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1254 |
| SimpleQA Verified | 60.7% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 20.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 36.9% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 58.3% | — |
Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | 1282 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1405 | 1289 |
| LMArena French | 1410 | 1318 |
| LMArena German | 1390 | 1287 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1385 | 1244 |
| LMArena Korean | 1341 | 1237 |
| LMArena Russian | 1401 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1384 | 1281 |
Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1412 | 1270 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 69.6% |
Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1411 | 1276 |
Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads
GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198)
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Sol | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1395 | 1305 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1378 | 1284 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1412 | 1290 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 63.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2125 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 45.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Sol better than Grok-2 (Dec 2024)?
GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-6 Sol or Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better for coding?
GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) share?
21 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34.