Noometry

Model comparison

Codellama 70b Instruct vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 70b Instruct Meta

33.7

Rank #237 Confirmed

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6 Sol leads 74.0 to 20.1.
  • Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
ProviderMetaOpenAI
Noometry Index33.761.8
Released—2026-09-22
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked745

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
DeepSWE—68.8%
FrontierCode—49.3%
LMArena WebDev—1688
SciCode—57.6%
BigCodeBench Instruct40.7%—
LMArena Coding—1447
BigCodeBench Complete49.6%—
ALE-Bench—2,462
HumanEval+65.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
APEX-Agents—54.3%
GDP.pdf—26.4%
Vending-Bench 2—14,428

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts10521418
ARC-AGI-2—89.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—90.1%
ARC-AGI-1—95.5%
CritPt—30.9%
EBR-Bench—53.3%
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—59.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—162.72

Math Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—89.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—90%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—83%
LMArena Math—1402

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
GPQA Diamond—94.3%
SimpleQA Verified—60.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.5%
LMArena Expert—1439

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision—1245
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.9%
Furniture Assembly—58.3%

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Non-English9921385
LMArena Chinese—1405
LMArena French—1410
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1385
LMArena Korean—1341
LMArena Russian—1401
LMArena Spanish—1384

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following10241412

Long Context Not comparable

Codellama 70b Instruct: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query—1411

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18)

BenchmarkCodellama 70b InstructGPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text10571395
LMArena Creative Writing—1378
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2125
LMArena Multi-Turn—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 70b Instruct or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and GPT-6 Sol share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper