Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 35.6.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
GPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index65.637.9
Released2026-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14871270
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14661264
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14641274
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert15021248
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14381262
LMArena Chinese14771319
LMArena Russian14551258

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14681245

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14651301

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14471274
LMArena Creative Writing14321242
LMArena Multi-Turn14491275

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper