Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6.1 Sol in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 81.9 to 22.0.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index37.865.6
Released2025-02-052026-09-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked3234

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Coding13221487
DeepSWE—75.2%
FrontierCode—50.2%
LMArena WebDev—1755
SciCode—55.8%
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —, GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
APEX-Agents—60%
GDP.pdf—32%

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Hard Prompts13241466
ARC-AGI-2—94.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—95.5%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—31.7%
Chess Puzzles—61%
EBR-Bench—54.3%
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—80%
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—166.09
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Math13091464
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—93.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—100%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—99%
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Expert13051502
GPQA Diamond—95.4%
SimpleQA Verified—73.9%
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Vision11001288
Furniture Assembly—80%

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Non-English13231438
LMArena Chinese13391477
LMArena Russian13281455
LMArena French1347—
LMArena German1306—
LMArena Japanese1301—
LMArena Korean1325—
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following13051468
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Longer Query13201465

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGPT-6.1 Sol
LMArena Text13301447
LMArena Creative Writing13191432
LMArena Multi-Turn13071449
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than GPT-6.1 Sol?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or GPT-6.1 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and GPT-6.1 Sol share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6.1 Sol has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper