Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

37.9

Rank #191 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 36.3.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderOpenAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index65.637.9
Released2026-09-29—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked3415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding14871291
DeepSWE75.2%—
FrontierCode50.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—
SciCode55.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
APEX-Agents60%—
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts14661272
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
CritPt31.7%—
Chess Puzzles61%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles80%—
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09—

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math14641305
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert15021295
GPQA Diamond95.4%—
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Vision1288—
Furniture Assembly80%—

Multilingual GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14381209
LMArena Chinese14771242
LMArena Russian14551193
LMArena French—1260
LMArena German—1262
LMArena Spanish—1289

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14681247

Long Context GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14651272

Writing & Preference GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolOlmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text14471272
LMArena Creative Writing14321226
LMArena Multi-Turn14491252

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper