Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 59× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5 Pro leads 44.0 to 36.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 55.8% for GPT-5 Pro and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 272K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | 147.37 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | 34.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1466 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1473 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1440 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 59× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.