Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.2 to 41.1.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GPT-5 Pro: 43.4 (#77), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 39.2 (#52), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.26 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.0 (#53), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1473 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.2 (#39), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.4 vs 43.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.