Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen3.7 Plus
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (46.2 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 40.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2026-06-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 30K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.60 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1460 |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |
Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1457 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1440 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1460 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen3.7 Plus?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (46.2 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3.7 Plus?
Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1M tokens.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3.7 Plus share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.