Model comparison

GPT-5 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 45.2 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 76× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5 Pro OpenAI

46.4

Rank #64 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 42.2.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 400K.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
GPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderOpenAIXiaomi
Noometry Index46.445.2
Released2025-10-062026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K1.05M
Max output272K131K
Input $ / M tokens$15$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$120$0.87
Results tracked1227

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML60.4%—
LMArena Coding—1503
ALE-Bench—899.8
AlgoTune1.31—

Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ARC-AGI-218.3%—
SimpleBench61.6%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark76.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
ARC-AGI-170.2%—
CritPt—4%
EnigmaEval18.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1488
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index150.28—

Math GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)55.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 419.5%—
ProofBench—22%
LMArena Math—1481
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads

GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
Humanity's Last Exam31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1503

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1449
LMArena Chinese—1507
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1437
LMArena Russian—1450
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1477

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1483

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5 ProMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text—1465
LMArena Creative Writing—1440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208
LMArena Multi-Turn—1477

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5 Pro better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 45.2 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs 76× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.

Is GPT-5 Pro or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper