Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 236× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 39.7.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $120 for GPT-5 Pro.
- GPT-5 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 262K |
| Max output | 272K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 236× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-5 Pro lists at $15 and $120.
Is GPT-5 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.