Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 8.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 24.9.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 30K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1396 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1425 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 8.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.