Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 96× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.5 Pro OpenAI

64.3

Rank #8 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.5 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 73.3 to 39.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3): 87.7% for GPT-5.5 Pro and 34.4% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $180 for GPT-5.5 Pro.
  • GPT-5.5 Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index64.345.3
Released2026-04-232026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$180$1.60
Results tracked1432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%
LMArena Coding—1473

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.3 (#10), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
CritPt30.6%9.1%
Chess Puzzles64%24%
DTBench96%84%
LMCA53.9%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index162.07147.37
ARC-AGI-284.6%—
SimpleBench76.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-196.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1460
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%

Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 84.0 (#10), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)87.7%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%93.3%
FrontierMath Tier 478%—
LMArena Math—1466
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)52.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)39.6%—

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads

GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.1 (#19), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond93.9%87.9%
LMArena Expert—1467

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1445
LMArena Chinese—1510
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Russian—1457
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1440

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query—1455

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGPT-5.5 ProQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text—1455
LMArena Creative Writing—1439
LMArena Multi-Turn—1460

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 96× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.5 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 Pro or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.5 Pro lists at $30 and $180.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.5 Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper