Model comparison

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.7 Plus

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6.1 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6.1 Sol OpenAI

65.6

Rank #6 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6.1 Sol leads 93.7 to 50.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Mystery Game Puzzles: 80% for GPT-6.1 Sol and 17% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $10 for GPT-6.1 Sol.
  • GPT-6.1 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus specifications
GPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index65.645.3
Released2026-09-292026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$10$1.60
Results tracked3432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.2 (#8), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierCode50.2%10.2%
SciCode55.8%45.5%
LMArena Coding14871473
DeepSWE75.2%—
LMArena WebDev1755—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 39.6 (#26), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
APEX-Agents60%—
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
GDP.pdf32%—

Reasoning GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 81.9 (#2), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)95.5%74.8%
CritPt31.7%9.1%
Chess Puzzles61%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts14661460
Mystery Game Puzzles80%17%
Epoch Capabilities Index166.09147.37
ARC-AGI-294.2%—
ARC-AGI-198.5%—
EBR-Bench54.3%—
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%

Math GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 93.7 (#1), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)93.7%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%93.3%
LMArena Math14641466
FrontierMath Tier 4100%—
ProofBench99%—

Knowledge GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 71.8 (#4), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond95.4%87.9%
LMArena Expert15021467
SimpleQA Verified73.9%—

Multimodal GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 52.7 (#5), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12881279
Furniture Assembly80%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Too close to call

GPT-6.1 Sol: 54.3 (#46), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14381445
LMArena Chinese14771510
LMArena Russian14551457
LMArena French—1473
LMArena German—1471
LMArena Japanese—1413
LMArena Korean—1415
LMArena Spanish—1457

Instruction Following GPT-6.1 Sol leads

GPT-6.1 Sol: 77.0 (#29), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14681440

Long Context Too close to call

GPT-6.1 Sol: 44.9 (#54), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14651455

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GPT-6.1 Sol: 63.6 (#63), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14471455
LMArena Creative Writing14321439
LMArena Multi-Turn14491460

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6.1 Sol better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

GPT-6.1 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.6 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Plus costs 5.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-6.1 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; GPT-6.1 Sol lists at $2 and $10.

Is GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

GPT-6.1 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 63.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6.1 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6.1 Sol has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper