Model comparison
GPT-5.5 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.5 Pro leads 83.8 to 37.3.
Side by side
| GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 64.3 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $180 | — |
| Results tracked | 14 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1488 |
Reasoning GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 73.6 (#7), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 84.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 76.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 96.5% | — |
| CritPt | 30.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 64% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1483 |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 53.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 162.45 | — |
Math GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 83.8 (#8), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 87.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 78% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 100% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 52.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 39.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5.5 Pro leads
GPT-5.5 Pro: 64.2 (#17), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 93.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1534 |
| LMArena French | — | 1483 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1467 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.5 Pro: —, Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.5 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
GPT-5.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 64.3 to 44.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.5 Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.5 Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.