Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.8

Rank #109 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 38.8.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 Chat and Muse Spark specifications
GPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
ProviderOpenAIMeta
Noometry Index42.850.6
Released2026-03-032026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 41.4 (#124), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Coding14081481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 28.5 (#102), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts13991474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#142), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Math13891455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.8 (#140), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Expert13971457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.3 (#124), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English13821464
LMArena Chinese14321509
LMArena French13971497
LMArena German13841497
LMArena Korean13461459
LMArena Russian14001466
LMArena Spanish13711472
LMArena Japanese1352—

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 72.8 (#129), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following13781442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#120), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query13961451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.1 (#68), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatMuse Spark
LMArena Text13891474
LMArena Creative Writing13551459
LMArena Multi-Turn14121477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 42.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 41.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Muse Spark share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper