Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen3-1.7B
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 15.4.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen3-1.7B?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.