Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Mistral Nemo
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 385× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Nemo in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 25.5.
- Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 128K.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 26.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 118.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Mistral Nemo?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 385× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Mistral Nemo?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Mistral Nemo share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.