Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen Turbo
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 660× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 14.5.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 400K.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen Turbo?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Turbo costs 660× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.