Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 38.7.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | — |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.