Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 38.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 specifications
Grok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index53.142.5
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14271390
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14131399
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14071414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14221395
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English13891395
LMArena Chinese14551425
LMArena Russian13971385
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Korean—1406
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14041374

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14131384

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text13991401
LMArena Creative Writing13911392
LMArena Multi-Turn13931393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper