Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 62× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Nemotron 3 Ultra in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 35.3.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper at $0.50 / $2.20 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 52.3 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2026-06-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 8 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 38.1 (#182)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 13.6% |
| SciCode | — | 40.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1468 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 23.4 (#126)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 22.7% |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 31.0 (#82)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.4 | 146.17 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1452 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 36.9% |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 35.3 (#187)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1457 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#61)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1472 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena French | — | 1472 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1454 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1418 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1437 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#36)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1692 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1411 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index. Nemotron 3 Ultra costs 62× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.2 Pro or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.20 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Nemotron 3 Ultra share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Ultra has 30.