Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Codex vs Wizardlm 13b

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Codex OpenAI

42.6

Rank #111 Reported

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.2 Codex leads 45.5 to 30.1.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Codex and Wizardlm 13b specifications
GPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.631.4
Released2025-12-18—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.2 Codex leads

GPT-5.2 Codex: 45.5 (#71), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)72.8%—
LMArena WebDev1339—
SWE-bench Multilingual66.3%—
LMArena Coding—1035
ALE-Bench1,300—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: 41.0 (#22), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
Terminal-Bench66.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts—1018

Math Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math—1017

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English—1034
LMArena Chinese—1023

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following—1048

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query—1054

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Codex: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 CodexWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text—1077
LMArena Creative Writing—1091
LMArena Multi-Turn—1047

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Codex better than Wizardlm 13b?

GPT-5.2 Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.2 Codex or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

GPT-5.2 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.5 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Codex and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Codex has 5 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper