Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-5.3 Chat vs Wizardlm 13b

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.3 Chat OpenAI

42.1

Rank #109 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

30.8

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-5.3 Chat leads 63.3 to 30.7.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.130.8
Released2026-03-03—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window128K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.75—
Output $ / M tokens$14—
Results tracked1810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 40.8 (#124), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14081035

Reasoning GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 27.3 (#105), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts13991018

Math GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 35.4 (#146), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math13891017

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-5.3 Chat: 38.2 (#137), Wizardlm 13b: —

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Expert1397—

Multilingual GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 50.5 (#119), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English13831034
LMArena Chinese14331023
LMArena French1398—
LMArena German1384—
LMArena Japanese1351—
LMArena Korean1347—
LMArena Russian1400—
LMArena Spanish1371—

Instruction Following GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 73.0 (#124), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following13781049

Long Context GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 42.6 (#115), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query13961054

Writing & Preference GPT-5.3 Chat leads

GPT-5.3 Chat: 63.3 (#65), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

BenchmarkGPT-5.3 ChatWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text13891077
LMArena Creative Writing13561090
LMArena Multi-Turn14131047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1690—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.3 Chat better than Wizardlm 13b?

GPT-5.3 Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-5.3 Chat or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

GPT-5.3 Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.3 Chat and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.3 Chat has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper