Model comparison
Qwen3.5-Flash vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 57.9 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-02-23 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1412 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1244 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 221.8 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.5-Flash: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | 462.69 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1403 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 20% | — |
| DTBench | 82.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 143.98 | — |
Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1017 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 18.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 6.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 82.3% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 20.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1407 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1385 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1446 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1412 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1368 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1344 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1379 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1048 |
Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1392 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads
Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-Flash | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1343 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.5-Flash or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5-Flash and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5-Flash has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.