Model comparison
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3 Coder Next
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.1-Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-5.1-Codex leads 41.9 to 36.3.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $10 for GPT-5.1-Codex.
- GPT-5.1-Codex accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 262K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-12 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | 262K |
| Max output | 128K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 6 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5.1-Codex leads
GPT-5.1-Codex: 41.9 (#116), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 66% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 1,245 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 38.0 (#33), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 60.4% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 70.8% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: —, Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.1-Codex: 30.3 (#235), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
GPT-5.1-Codex is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.1-Codex's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex lists at $1.25 and $10.
Is GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.1-Codex does, with 400K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.1-Codex and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.1-Codex has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.