Model comparison
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Arcee AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 16.9.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.80 for Trinity Large Thinking.
Side by side
| Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2026-02-02 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.12 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 32.3% | 36.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| WeirdML | 34.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Not comparable
Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen3 Coder Next: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder Next | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3 Coder Next better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Trinity Large Thinking?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Trinity Large Thinking lists at $0.25 and $0.80.
Is Qwen3 Coder Next or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3 Coder Next and Trinity Large Thinking share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 Coder Next has 3 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.