Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 31.6.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| WeirdML | 12.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 17.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.89 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | — |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1283 | — |
| LMArena German | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4 or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.