Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.3

Rank #281 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 Turbo scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 33.1 to 8.6.

Side by side

GPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index30.338.0
Released2023-11-06—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$10—
Output $ / M tokens$30—
Results tracked3612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding12681307
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts12511286
SimpleBench25.1%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench61.6%—
LMCA9.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25—
ForecastBench59.4—

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math12721281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
MATH Level 546.7%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert12231276
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
MMLU81.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12451265
LMArena Chinese12421346
LMArena Russian12591266
LMArena French1275—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12501277

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12541342

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)

BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12721288
LMArena Creative Writing12691264
LMArena Multi-Turn12671284

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper