Model comparison

GPT-4 Turbo vs Sonar

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Sonar leads 33.7 to 9.0.
  • Sonar is cheaper at $1 / $1 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.

Side by side

GPT-4 Turbo and Sonar specifications
GPT-4 TurboSonar
ProviderOpenAIPerplexity
Noometry Index30.538.5
Released2023-11-062024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K128K
Max output4K4K
Input $ / M tokens$10$1
Output $ / M tokens$30$1
Results tracked367

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Sonar leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
WeirdML18%—
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1268—
BigCodeBench Complete58.2%—
HumanEval+86.6%—
MBPP+73.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: —, Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
METR Time Horizons36.7%—

Reasoning Sonar leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
SimpleBench25.1%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1251—
DTBench61.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA9.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.25—
ForecastBench59.4—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Sonar leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)0.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20256.7%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1272—
MATH Level 546.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
GPQA Diamond46.6%—
Confabulations28.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—
MMLU81.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
LMArena Vision1090—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
LMArena Non-English1245—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1276—
LMArena German1259—
LMArena Japanese1194—
LMArena Korean1187—
LMArena Russian1259—
LMArena Spanish1260—

Instruction Following Sonar leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1249—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
LMArena Longer Query1254—

Writing & Preference Sonar leads

GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4 TurboSonar
LMArena Text1272—
LMArena Creative Writing1269—
LMArena Multi-Turn1267—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 Turbo better than Sonar?

Sonar is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 Turbo or Sonar?

Sonar is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $1 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.

Is GPT-4 Turbo or Sonar better for coding?

Sonar scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 Turbo and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 Turbo has 36 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper