Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 34.5 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1148 |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1164 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1186 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1104 |
| LMArena French | — | 1158 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1049 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1142 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.