Model comparison
GPT-4.5 vs Wizardlm 13b
GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.5 leads 56.9 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-27 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 42 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1035 |
| Aider Polyglot | 44.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 39.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 75.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 17.5% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1403 | 1018 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 34.5% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 10.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 3.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 71.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 64.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 136.74 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 69% | — |
Math GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1412 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 37.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 69.3% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 78.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 68.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 5.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1394 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1195 | — |
| VPCT | 45% | — |
Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1413 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1421 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | — |
| LMArena German | 1457 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1419 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 72.3% | — |
Long Context GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1406 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 63.9% | — |
Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads
GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1417 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1394 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1444 | 1047 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 75.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1258 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 61.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?
GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.