Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen-14B

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GPT-4.5 leads 56.9 to 27.6.
  • Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and Qwen-14B specifications
GPT-4.5Qwen-14B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.231.4
Released2025-02-272023-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Coding13961071
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Qwen-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Qwen-14B leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts14031027
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74113.03
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
ForecastBench61.7—
LAMBADA—71.1%
LiveBench69%—
PIQA—79.9%

Math GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Math14121068
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—
LMArena Expert1394—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%
MMLU—66.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Non-English14131041
LMArena Chinese14211077
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1419—

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following14041031
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query14061028
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen-14B
LMArena Text14171051
LMArena Creative Writing13941028
LMArena Multi-Turn14441022
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen-14B?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Qwen-14B better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper