Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Wizardlm 13b
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1035 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1018 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1048 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Wizardlm 13b?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.