Noometry

Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 13.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 37.8% for GPT-4.5 and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

GPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.251.5
Released2025-02-272026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked4233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding13961498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
Cybench17.5%—
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench34.5%70.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14031483
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74153.68
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EnigmaEval3.2%—
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
LMCA—44%
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%95.6%
LMArena Math14121490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
ProofBench—26%
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond68.7%90.9%
LMArena Expert13941488
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14131474
LMArena Chinese14211530
LMArena Russian14191484
LMArena French1418—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14041460
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14061482
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14171476
LMArena Creative Writing13941449
LMArena Multi-Turn14441481
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 42.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper