Model comparison
Qwen3.7 Max vs Yi-Lightning
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-Lightning in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 36.2.
Side by side
| Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 51.5 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2026-05-19 | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 33 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1498 | 1312 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 77.3% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1515 | — |
| SciCode | 48.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,189 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135), Yi-Lightning: —
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 0.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1483 | 1302 |
| SimpleBench | 70.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 85.1% | — |
| CritPt | 13.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 19% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 9.5% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 32% | — |
| DTBench | 92.3% | — |
| LMCA | 44% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.68 | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1490 | 1300 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 64.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 34.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| ProofBench | 26% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1488 | 1286 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1530 | 1320 |
| LMArena Russian | 1484 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1305 |
| LMArena German | — | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1315 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1278 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7 Max | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1476 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1449 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1481 | 1311 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1110 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen3.7 Max better than Yi-Lightning?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen3.7 Max or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen3.7 Max and Yi-Lightning share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.7 Max has 33 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.