Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

36.9

Rank #200 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where GPT-4.5 leads 27.6 to 18.4.
  • Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct specifications
GPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.929.4
Released2025-02-272024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.80
Output $ / M tokens—$8.40
Results tracked426

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 41.8 (#102), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—
LMArena Coding1397—

Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 27.6 (#92), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Cybench17.5%—
OSWorld—5%

Reasoning Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct leads

GPT-4.5: 14.1 (#320), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36%
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1404—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 31.0 (#200), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
LMArena Math1412—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 32.4 (#205), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—
LMArena Expert1394—

Multimodal GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 37.0 (#68), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Vision11951107
Video-MME—73.5%
GeoBench—62%
VPCT45%—
SpatialViz-Bench—33.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 52.7 (#78), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1413—
LMArena Chinese1421—
LMArena French1417—
LMArena German1457—
LMArena Japanese1416—
LMArena Korean1392—
LMArena Russian1419—

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 72.8 (#129), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#150), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1406—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 57.1 (#129), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
LMArena Text1417—
LMArena Creative Writing1394—
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LMArena Multi-Turn1444—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper